In this article, we discuss the limitations of compliance-driven pentesting compared to the broader scope of security-driven pentesting. While compliance-driven pentesting meets regulatory requirements (e.g., PCI DSS, HIPAA), it often misses deeper vulnerabilities and can leave critical issues undetected by following a checklist approach.
In the world of horse racing, AI software can come up with a race prediction based on historical data with much more precision than any experienced handicapper with years of experience in the betting business. Can you imagine if this data falls into the hands of the wrong people?
Today, 17 years later, Apple is still standing strong, but surrounded by powerful and not less innovative competitors. Will Apple keep its position, and what are the steps the company takes to remain a symbol of innovation and a valuable tech company?
In this article we’ll demonstrate how to integrate BeEF (Browser Exploitation Framework) with Metasploit to enhance penetration testing capabilities. BeEF focuses on exploiting web browser vulnerabilities and conducting real-time social engineering attacks, while Metasploit is known for its powerful exploit development and execution against remote targets.
In this article, we’ll explore the concept of Zero Trust, a security framework designed to address the risks confronting modern businesses, both internally and externally. Despite its advantages, Zero Trust is not a one-size-fits-all solution and faces several limitations and challenges.
In this article, we’ll discuss the importance of expertise in pentesting, particularly emphasizing the superiority of manual Pentesting over automated solutions. Automated tools and/or solutions lack the human intuition and critical thinking necessary for thorough assessments.
